Skip to main content

State v. Garland

Citations

  • 963 S.W.2d 95
  • 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 226
  • 1998 WL 13097

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the timetable for filing objections begins when the commissioners’ decision is filed with the trial court, subject to tolling if proper notice is not sent
  • “Had the Legislature intended the time period to run from the signing of the actual award, or from the date that the award should have been filed in court, it could easily have said so.”
  • “Had the Legislature intended the time period to run from the signing of the actual award, or from the Appellees do not disagree that—pursuant to section date that the award should have been filed in court, it could 21.018(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers, Jones, Kidd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.