Anderson v. Gilbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party’s arguments, and not just the wording of a point of error, should be considered
• “An appellate court should consider the parties’ arguments supporting each point of error and not merely the wording of the points.”
• courts are to construe rules on briefing liberally and consider parties’ arguments and not merely wording of issues
• appellate courts should construe briefs liberally and consider the substance of the parties’ arguments and not merely how points of error are worded
• “An appellate court should consider the parties’ arguments supporting each point of error and not merely the wording of the points.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).