State v. Garcia
Citations
- 26 N.M. 70
- 188 P. 1104
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. In applying- for a continuance, a party, in showing efforts constituting due diligence used in obtaining witnesses, must state facts with such definiteness and certainty that the court may determine whether they amount to legal diligence. P. 71</p> <p>2. The motion for continuance must show some probability of procuring- absent witnesses or testimony, should the continuance be granted. P. 71</p> <p>3. The granting or denying of a motion for continuance is in the sound discretion of the court, and unless such discretion- has been abused, to the injury of the party applying therefor, the denial does not constitute error. P. 71</p> <p>4. Where the evidence establishes the forgery of a bank check, it is wholly immaterial as to whether the check was ever presented for payment or not. P. 72</p>
Judges: Parker, Raynolds, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WeberNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-08-22· cited 33×
- State v. RuffinsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-04-11· cited 29×
- State v. NguyenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-04-09· cited 17×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1930-01-13· cited 15×
- Owens v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1950-06-23· cited 8×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.