Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/26/2024
State v. Garcia
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5612
Syllabus
Because the trial court considered the principles and purposes of felony sentencing on the record during the sentencing hearing and the court's entry reflects it engaged in the required analysis under R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12, the sentence is not contrary to law. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Edelstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court· 2023-10-25· cited 232×
- State v. StubbsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-26· cited 41×
- State v. O.E.P.-T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-20· cited 22×
- State v. HaddadOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-06· cited 15×
- State v. ReevesOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-13· cited 12×
- State v. BruceOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-22· cited 10×
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-29· cited 8×
- State v. DodsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-15· cited 4×
- State v. CochranOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-23· cited 4×
- State v. PackOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-31· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.