Supreme Court of Iowa· 4/15/1987

State v. Gansz

Citations

403 N.W.2d 778
1987 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding a defendant cannot claim violation of statutory speedy trial rights when the defendant is present when a trial date is selected, knows the reasons the date is selected, and does not inform the court that he believed the trial date violated his speedy trial rights
noting “if it could be demonstrated that the prior dismissal, regardless of its stated purpose, was without adequate cause and that it impacted unfavorably upon a defendant’s speedy trial rights, the resulting delay in prosecution would warrant a dismissal”
noting “if it could be demonstrated that the prior dismissal, regardless of its stated purpose, was without adequate cause and that it impacted unfavorably upon a defendant’s speedy trial rights, the resulting delay in prosecution would warrant a dismissal”
dismissal “without adequate cause and [which] impacted unfavorably upon a defendant’s speedy trial rights” warrants dismissal on speedy-trial grounds
if prior dismissal was without adequate cause and had a negative effect upon a defendant’s speedy trial rights, the second prosecution must be dismissed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Schultz, Carter, Wolle, Lavorato

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.