Skip to main content

State v. Fyfe

Citations

  • 370 P.3d 1092
  • 2016 Alas. LEXIS 37
  • 2016 WL 1168203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “the usual grammatical function of the word ‘or’ is ‘to mark an alternative such as either this or that’ ” (quoting In re Jesusa V., 85 P.3d 2, 24 (Cal. 2004))
  • observing that “the usual grammatical function of the word ‘or’ is ‘to mark an alternative such as either this or that’ ” (quoting In re Jesusa V., 85 P.3d 2, 24 (Cal. 2004))
  • noting that the use of conjunction \ 'or' is 'to mark an alternative such as either this or that' \ (quoting In re Jesusa V. , 32 Cal.4th 588 , 10 Cal.Rptr.3d 205 , 85 P.3d 2 , 24 (2004) )
  • accepting court of appeals’ reliance on governor’s transmittal letter in legislative history analysis
  • accepting court of appeals’ reliance on governor’s transmittal letter in legislative history analysis
  • “[T]he plainer the statutory language is, the more convincing the evidence of contrary legislative purpose or intent must be.” (quoting Adamson v. Municipality of Anchorage, 333 P.3d 5, 11 (Alaska 2014))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stowers, Fabe, Maassen, Bolger, Winfree

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Fyfe

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.