State v. Bell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the State bears the burden of production regarding any alleged new criminal offenses but the defendant bears the ultimate burden of persuasion
• “It is possible that Bell may have been remanded because he was temporarily unable to pay for his electronic monitoring program.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2018-04-20· cited 4×
• Belknap v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2018-07-27· cited 1×
• Berthier v. People of the Virgin Islands
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2024-12-05

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Marks v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1972-04-21· cited 144×
• Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1996-09-13· cited 84×
• Beck v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-07-31· cited 75×
• State v. Fyfe
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2016-03-25· cited 51×