United States v. James Edwards Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant who demonstrates no actual prejudice in his trial was not entitled to new trial despite trial court’s violation of Rule 11
• concluding that the district court participated in plea negotiations when “the judge offered a plea bargain to [the defendant] on her own initiative”
• concluding that the district court participated in plea negotiations when “the judge offered a plea bargain to [the defendant] on her own initiative”
• holding that defendant who demonstrates no actual prejudice in his trial was not entitled to new trial despite trial court’s violation of Rule 11
• holding that the district court participated in plea discussions when it discussed the bargain with the parties in chambers and “offered a plea bargain to [the defendant] on [its] own initiative”
• concluding that the fourth prong was satisfied after judicial participation in plea discussions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).