State v. Fuller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the “type of offense” factor weighs in favor of finding violation proceedings for theft to be a criminal prosecution, in part, because “the prohibition against theft predates our common law” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that, “considered in light of inflation,” as of 2012, a $1,250 fine could properly be imposed in a civil proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Whitten
  Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-08· cited 7×
• State v. Person
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-20· cited 1×
• State v. Freeman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-03· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. Multnomah County District Court
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-10-12· cited 214×
• State v. Gallant
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-30· cited 44×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kimmell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-08-30· cited 27×
• State v. Benoit
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-10-03· cited 16×
• State v. Fuller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 3×