Oregon Supreme Court· 10/3/2013

State v. Benoit

Citations

354 Or. 302
311 P.3d 874
2013 WL 5497271
2013 Ore. LEXIS 790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining that subjecting the defendant to “those uniquely criminal procedures” weighed in favor of finding that the proceeding was a criminal prosecution
determining that subjecting the defendant to “those uniquely criminal procedures” weighed in favor of finding that the proceeding was a criminal prosecution
determining that subjecting the defendant to “those uniquely criminal procedures” weighed in favor of finding that the proceeding was a criminal prosecution
explaining that “ [n] o subsequent election by the state to purportedly decriminalize the charge can change the fact that defendant was subjected to those uniquely criminal procedures and their stigmatizing effect”
discussing Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95, 102-08, 570 P2d 52 (1977)
considering a claim that trial court did not properly discharge its constitutional obligation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.