Skip to main content

State v. Fudge

Citations

  • 206 S.W.3d 850
  • 361 Ark. 412
  • 2005 Ark. LEXIS 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel’s decision to not investigate certain mitigating evidence was “within the wide range of reasonable professional’ assistance” and was not- deficient performance
  • holding that counsel’s decision to not investigate certain mitigating evidence was “within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance” and was not deficient performance
  • addressing cross-appeal of appellee without expressly deciding whether a notice of cross-appeal is required in a State’s appeal of postconviction proceedings
  • “There is no presumption of deficiency or prejudice under Strickland even to a concession of guilt on the capital-murder charge itself[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim Gunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.