State v. Frey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial judge cannot usurp the prosecutor's discretion by reducing a criminal charge before trial
• “The courts have no power to interfere with the discretion of the prosecutor unless he is acting illegally or in excess of his powers.” (quoting Murphy, 113 Ariz. at 418)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Prentiss
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-11-09· cited 61×
• State v. Ramsey
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-03-03· cited 21×
• State v. Dykes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-03-29· cited 16×
• State v. Larson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-07-05· cited 15×
• Bazzanella v. Tucson City Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-06-17· cited 15×
• State v. Weinstein
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-06-20· cited 11×
• Amancio v. Forster
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-04-01· cited 8×
• State v. Quintana
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-09-02· cited 8×
• State v. Pope
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-02-12· cited 7×
• Rider v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-09-05· cited 4×
• Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty. Juv. Action
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-02-04· cited 3×
• In Re Isaac G.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-09-18· cited 1×
• State v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-02-04· cited 1×
• Joel Carson v. Hon. gentry/state
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2025-08-20