Court of Appeals of Iowa· 12/6/2017

State v. Frescoln

Citations

911 N.W.2d 450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining that a warrant for a blood draw under section 321J.2 “implie[d] the blood sample would be subjected to chemical testing”
addressing a warrant with the exact same language and applying a “common sense” reading of the warrant
listing cases in various jurisdictions and other authority arriving at this conclusion
“Consent to 12 chemical testing obtained under the implied consent statute falls under the voluntary consent exception to the warrant requirement.”
“Consent to chemical testing obtained under the implied consent statute falls under the voluntary consent exception to the warrant requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danilson, Doyle, Mullins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.