Court of Appeals of Arizona· 6/15/2000
State v. French
Citations
- 7 P.3d 128
- 198 Ariz. 119
- 325 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 28
- 2000 Ariz. App. LEXIS 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a petition for review incorporating trial court filings “utterly fails to comply with Rule 32.9” and rejecting summarily the claims raised
- finding that a petition for review incorporating trial court filings “utterly fails to comply with Rule 32.9,” and therefore rejecting summarily the claims raised
- applying the procedural default rule to petitioner’s ineffectiveness claim because ”[n]one of these omissions constitutes ineffectiveness so egregious and of such constitutional dimensions that it may not be precluded”
- finding petition for review incorporating trial court filings “utterly fails to comply with Rule 32.9” and therefore summarily rejecting claims raised
- finding petition for review incorporating trial court filings “utterly fails to comply” with Rules governing post-conviction relief and therefore rejecting summarily claims raised
- summarily rejecting claims not complying with rules governing form and content of petitions for review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flórez, Pelander, Brammer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stewart v. SmithSupreme Court· 2002-06-28· cited 158×
- Stewart v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 2002-05-30· cited 70×
- Robert Douglas Smith v. Terry Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 2001-03-06· cited 25×
- Stewart v. SmithSupreme Court· 2001-12-12· cited 17×
- Cousin v. SavageNinth Circuit· 2002-07-01· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Michael Eugene TraversoArizona Supreme Court· 2025-09-23
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 276×
- State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court· 1998-07-14· cited 123×
- State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court· 1989-07-18· cited 105×
- State v. TerrazasArizona Supreme Court· 1997-08-14· cited 96×
- State v. MataArizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 69×
- State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court· 1996-04-16· cited 66×
- State v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-10-17· cited 61×
- State v. CoronaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-02-11· cited 27×
- State v. RomeroArizona Supreme Court· 1981-09-29· cited 21×
- State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-04-22· cited 20×
- State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-09-12· cited 12×
- State v. Arizona Department of CorrectionsArizona Supreme Court· 1996-12-05· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.