Skip to main content

State v. Freeman

Citations

  • 542 So. 2d 483
  • 1989 WL 45412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding insufficient evidence, to prove loitering where defendant was part of a group that dispersed at the. sight of law enforcement and the group was congregated in a high-crime area
  • reversing where the officer observed the defendant standing on a street corner in a group adjacent to a grocery store where drug dealing frequently occurred
  • reversing where the officer observed the defendant standing on a street corner in a group adjacent to a grocery store where drug dealing frequently occurred
  • reversal of loitering or prowling conviction of defendant seen remaining for long periods at a street corner by a store with a “no loitering” sign
  • defendant could not be arrested for loitering and prowling where he was standing with group on street corner adjacent to grocery store and group dispersed on approach of police officers
  • defendant could not be arrested for loitering and prowling where he was standing with group on street comer adjacent to grocery store and group dispersed on approach of police officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.