Carroll v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the loitering or prowling statute “reaches the outer limits of constitutionality and must be applied with special care”
• section 856.021 does not proscribe particular conduct, so it reaches outer limits of constitutionality and must be applied with special care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Simms v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-28· cited 9×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-18· cited 5×
• S.K.W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-17· cited 4×
• McClamma v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-09· cited 3×
• McGee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-15· cited 1×
• Mash v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-30
• Benny Saintil v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-03-26

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ecker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-02-19· cited 174×
• D.A. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-11· cited 64×
• Chamson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-21· cited 14×
• State v. Freeman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-05· cited 9×
• Ingram v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-18· cited 6×