Skip to main content

State v. Franklin

Citations

  • 263 P.3d 585
  • 172 Wash. 2d 831

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that resentencing was not necessary where a Brooks notation ensured that a sentence with potential to exceed the statutory maximum, entered prior to the enactment of RCW 9.94A.701, would not exceed the statutory maximum
  • noting that “[t]his court has not addressed the continuing applicability of Brooks in light of RCW 9.94A.70K9
  • refusing to order amendment of judgment and sentence where the DOC can act within authority consistent with the SRA
  • refusing to order amendment of judgment and sentence where the DOC can act within authority consistent with the SRA
  • refusing to order amendment of judgment and sentence where the DOC can act within authority consistent with the SRA
  • directive that court reduce term of community custody to avoid sentence in excess of statutory maximum applies only when court first imposes sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen, Johnson, Alexander, Chambers, Owens, Fairhurst, Stephens, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.