State v. Franco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the facts are not in dispute, our function is to decide whether the trial court applied legal principles correctly to those facts.”
• the Sixth Amendment requires analysis of the particular circumstances in which the statement is made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stevens v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2001-06-25· cited 212×
• State v. Page
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-01-12· cited 19×
• State v. Ventris
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-11-24· cited 12×
• State v. Espinosa
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-04-10· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Idaho v. Wright
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
• State v. Stevens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 332×
• State v. Nielsen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 62×
• State v. Wilson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-07-05· cited 33×
• State v. George
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-02-19· cited 15×