Skip to main content

State v. Fox

Citations

  • 262 Or. App. 473
  • 324 P.3d 608
  • 2014 WL 1628126
  • 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 573

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “violation of public trust” could not serve as a sentencing-enhancement fact because an element of the crime was the threat to abuse the defendant’s position as a public servant
  • holding that “violation of public trust” could not serve as a sentencing-enhancement fact because an element of the crime was the threat to abuse the defendant’s position as a public servant
  • where an attempted crime includes the element of forcible compulsion, the state must prove that a defendant, with the requisite intent, took a substantial step towards forcibly compelling the victim to engage in the act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan, Schuman, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.