District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/30/1972
State v. Foust
Citations
- 262 So. 2d 686
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[T]he reasonableness of the search after arrest was not affected by the fact that the original stopping . . . may have been without probable cause.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pearson, Charles Carroll and Haverfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FriersonSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-02-09· cited 57×
- Willingham v. City of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-12· cited 41×
- Wigfall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-10-21· cited 33×
- Jacobs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-02-01· cited 24×
- McBath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2005-02-18· cited 24×
- Frierson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-06· cited 14×
- Mays v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-08· cited 8×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-08-28· cited 3×
- Sloan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-09· cited 3×
- Oliva v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-05
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.