Willingham v. City of Orlando

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the benefit of [Section 768.28(9)(a
• identifying false arrest as \the unlawful restraint of a person against that person's will\
• “The cases seem to treat false imprisonment and false arrest as essentially the same tort when the issue involves an arrest and detention by a law enforcement officer.”
• \Judgmental or discretionary government functions are immune from legal action . . . .\
• “There could be, however, no governmental liability unless a common law or statutory duty of care existed that would have been applicable to an individual, as opposed to the .general public, under similar circumstances.” (citing Pollock, 882 So.2d at 931)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).