Supreme Court of New Jersey· 12/11/1985
State v. Fort
Citations
- 501 A.2d 140
- 101 N.J. 123
- 1985 N.J. LEXIS 2400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a requirement that co-defendants agree not to testify favorably for defendant as part of their plea agreement violated defendant's right to compulsory process
- noting the “search for truth” is not well served when the State attempts to fortify its case “by sealing the lips of witnesses”
- plea agreement with co-defendants conditioned on their agreement not to testify for defendants violated defendants' constitutional rights
- a \no testimony\ plea agreement violates a co-defendant's rights to due process and to present witnesses in his favor
- “no testimony” agreement violated rights to due process and to present favorable witnesses
- “no testimony” agreement violated defendant’s due process rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pollock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-03-05· cited 771×
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-03-05· cited 731×
- State v. LongSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-06-21· cited 164×
- State v. ScherzerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-05-20· cited 164×
- Peterson v. PetersonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-01-03· cited 67×
- State v. FeasterSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2005-07-14· cited 63×
- State v. McBrideNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-10-21· cited 44×
- Bhagwat v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-05-16· cited 24×
- State v. One 1986 SubaruNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-02-09· cited 14×
- State v. WeaverOregon Supreme Court· 2020-09-03· cited 13×
- State v. DaytonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-07-01· cited 10×
- State of Arizona v. Veronica Sanchez-EquihuaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-05-19· cited 8×
- State v. AsherCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1993-10-22· cited 6×
- State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-02-22· cited 6×
- State v. ShawNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-12-10· cited 6×
- State v. VassosNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-01-16· cited 5×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-26· cited 5×
- State v. MurphyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-03-22· cited 3×
- State v. BellNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-02-06· cited 3×
- Lewis v. Department of CorrectionsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-01-13· cited 3×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court· 1972-12-04· cited 788×
- People v. ShapiroNew York Court of Appeals· 1980-07-03· cited 410×
- United States v. Kenneth Wayne Goodwin, Charles William Bullard and Grover Eugene BeaverFifth Circuit· 1980-09-12· cited 182×
- United States v. Larry Hammond, A/K/A Larry HooverFifth Circuit· 1979-07-16· cited 134×
- State v. MarzolfSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-02-14· cited 93×
- United States v. Michael Thomas and Joseph YoppoloSixth Circuit· 1973-12-06· cited 91×
- United States v. Sherryl Lynn Grimsbo HenricksenFifth Circuit· 1977-12-08· cited 60×
- James Trent Bray v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent, Virginia State PenitentiaryFourth Circuit· 1970-06-04· cited 36×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-02-18· cited 22×
- State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals· 1976-10-26· cited 18×
- State v. HuntNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-10-06· cited 9×
- State v. FortNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-10-25· cited 3×
- State v. FortSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-02-11· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.