State v. Forrester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• though not required, whether defendant was informed and knew he had the right to deny consent is a factor to be considered in determining if the consent was freely and voluntarily made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Forrester
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-02-12· cited 111×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
• Riggins v. Nevada
  Supreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 734×
• Singleton v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-08-30· cited 49×
• State v. Wallace
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-10-31· cited 23×
• State v. Austin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-10-07· cited 22×
• Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. Hamm
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-07· cited 19×
• State v. Temple
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-02-28· cited 18×
• State v. Andrews
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-28· cited 14×
• People v. Brownlee
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-12-08· cited 10×