Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/27/2023

State v. Ford

Citations

2023 Ohio 568

Syllabus

SENTENCING CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE Trial court's sentence was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law. Appellant did not demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel related to sentencing hearing.

Judges: Waldick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Hilz
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-25

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Strickland v. Washington
Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
State v. Bradley
Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 457×
State v. Kole
Ohio Supreme Court· 2001-07-18· cited 263×
State v. Bryant
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-06-07· cited 205×
State v. Gwynne
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-12-23· cited 142×
State v. Davis (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-02-04· cited 130×
State v. Grate (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-10· cited 117×
State v. Jenkins
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-10· cited 40×
State v. Reed
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-10· cited 18×
State v. Olsen
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-15· cited 5×
State v. Jordan
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-09· cited 5×
State v. Riggleman
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-29· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.