Idaho Supreme Court· 6/15/1916
State v. Fong Loon
Citations
- 29 Idaho 248
- 158 P. 233
- 1916 Ida. LEXIS 70
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We believe it will be admitted that habitual users of opium, or other like narcotics, become notorious liars,”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Budge, Morgan, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- People v. CrumpIllinois Supreme Court· 1955-03-24· cited 116×
- Fields v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1971-08-06· cited 72×
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals· 1959-05-14· cited 60×
- The People v. BoydIllinois Supreme Court· 1959-09-24· cited 59×
- Coates v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-05-12· cited 56×
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-09-07· cited 51×
- State v. RennebergWashington Supreme Court· 1974-05-23· cited 35×
- People v. GarrettAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-12-14· cited 29×
- Gallegos v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1965-07-06· cited 27×
- Beasley v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1965-08-18· cited 26×
- People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-12-20· cited 26×
- United States v. Herbert OttSeventh Circuit· 1973-12-05· cited 22×
- Saavedra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-11-04· cited 22×
- State v. LettermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-08-25· cited 19×
- Kelly v. Maryland Casualty Co.W.D. Virginia· 1929-07-16· cited 18×
- Oliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-08-29· cited 17×
- Fraser v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court· 1916-04-21· cited 16×
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. McKennaEighth Circuit· 1934-11-26· cited 14×
- Effinger v. EffingerNevada Supreme Court· 1924-09-10· cited 14×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 157×
- People v. . WebsterNew York Court of Appeals· 1893-10-03· cited 114×
- Hollingsworth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1890-07-05· cited 64×
- Peoples v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1888-10-27· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. SchaffnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1888-04-06· cited 36×
- People v. HodgdonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 23×
- People v. Ah YuteCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 22×
- People v. Un DongCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-02-07· cited 21×
- People v. Lee FatCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 20×
- State v. AnthonyIdaho Supreme Court· 1899-01-03· cited 18×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1907-11-18· cited 16×
- Burdette v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1892-03-24· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. WelchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1901-06-22· cited 14×
- Clements v. McGinnCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-08-30· cited 13×
- Gifford v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1877-09-15· cited 11×
- Jones v. DuchowCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-12-13· cited 9×
- People v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-11-01· cited 9×
- People v. TileyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-07-08· cited 8×
- Hayward v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1880-11-17· cited 8×
- Peak v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1888-02-15· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.