People v. Lee Fat
Citations
- 54 Cal. 527
Syllabus
<p>Evidence—Perjurt—Crjminai. Law.—Upon the trial of an indictment for perjury, alleged to have been committed by the defendant iny testifying upon the examination of a party charged with felony, the complaint against the .latter—sworn to by the defendant—is admissible for the purpose of showing the pendency of the case in which the perjury was alleged to have been committed.</p> <p>Id.—Reporter's Hotes—Interpreter.— By an act of the Legislature, the reporter’s notes, taken before a committing magistrate upon a preliminary examination for felony, are made prima facie evidence of the testimony given; but held, that such notes were inadmissible where the testimony was taken through an interpreter.</p>
Judges: Bank, Morrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Correa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-02-25· cited 71×
- State v. Fong LoonIdaho Supreme Court· 1916-06-15· cited 61×
- People v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1957-01-11· cited 30×
- People v. Ah YuteCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 22×
- Luse v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1931-04-06· cited 17×
- Reid v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-08-19· cited 17×
- People v. SierpCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-03-10· cited 15×
- People v. AmayaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-05-05· cited 12×
- People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-09-11· cited 11×
- In re Coburn & GlocheskiMichigan Supreme Court· 1919-10-06· cited 3×
- People v. WangCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-09-12· cited 1×
- Correa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-01-24· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.