State v. Folson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s position at trial was that the State could not prove the existence of any weapon, regardless of whether it was characterized as a deadly weapon or a dangerous instrument, which was a defense that was equally available to him before and after the amendment to the information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Davies
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-12-14· cited 21×
• State v. Smith
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-11-21· cited 16×
• State v. Hoover
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-03-20· cited 12×
• State of Missouri v. Andrew Canaday
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-12-08· cited 9×
• State of Missouri v. Aaron D. Lucy
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-08-26· cited 5×
• State v. Sitton
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-09-13· cited 3×
• State v. FASNUT
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-01-26· cited 1×
• STATE OF MISSOURI v. OTIS L. LAMBERT
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-11-20

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Chaney
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1998-03-24· cited 291×
• State v. Pike
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2005-04-26· cited 104×
• State v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1964-02-10· cited 61×
• Rosenberg v. Arlington County Government
  Supreme Court· 1998-11-30· cited 47×
• State v. Kee
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-09-09· cited 23×
• State v. Boone Retirement Center, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-06-27· cited 20×
• State v. MacE
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-01-24· cited 18×
• State v. Daniels
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-03-28· cited 13×
• State v. Maynard
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-03-18· cited 6×