North Dakota Supreme Court· 12/19/1980
State v. Flohr
Citations
- 301 N.W.2d 367
- 1980 N.D. LEXIS 311
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Rule 12.1 certainly does not represent an unconditional restriction on a defendant’s ability to make out his case. The defendant is forbidden nothing, but is required only to proceed in a certain manner.”
- “A defendant’s right to present evidence on his own behalf . . . is not a right to confound otherwise reasonable rules of procedure aimed at ascertaining the truth and accomplishing justice.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Walle, Erickstad, Paulson, Pederson, Sand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BoucinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-03-18· cited 92×
- Taliaferro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-02-10· cited 65×
- In the Interest of T.F. v. Director, Traill County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-06-30· cited 38×
- State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-07-20· cited 27×
- City of Fargo v. StutlienNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-09-08· cited 25×
- State v. SevignyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-10-17· cited 24×
- Wagner v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-10-18· cited 18×
- State v. FlohrNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-10-05· cited 14×
- State v. KalmioNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-05-28· cited 12×
- Bleth v. BlethNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-03-21· cited 11×
- State v. DymowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-07-31· cited 10×
- MacCormick v. MacCormickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-06-06· cited 6×
- Interest of R.O.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-07-20· cited 3×
- State v. BelgardeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-03-30· cited 1×
- State v. KokronNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-06-30
- Interest of K.S.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-10-17
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court· 1798-08-17· cited 1,860×
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 1,651×
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court· 1925-11-23· cited 945×
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 827×
- Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1883-04-18· cited 472×
- Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court· 1898-04-25· cited 472×
- United States v. Elorance James, William Stanfield, and Antonio VasquezFifth Circuit· 1975-05-09· cited 99×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-12-02· cited 48×
- State v. CokeleyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 39×
- State v. DoddArizona Supreme Court· 1966-09-28· cited 38×
- Gene Austin Rider v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, KansasTenth Circuit· 1966-03-01· cited 29×
- Bush v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1969-05-17· cited 22×
- People v. Charles JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1976-09-28· cited 18×
- United States v. Norman Dennis SmithD.C. Circuit· 1975-12-22· cited 16×
- Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1975-01-13· cited 16×
- City of Grand Forks v. HendersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-10-07· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.