Skip to main content

State v. Fitzpatrick

Citations

  • 491 P.2d 262
  • 5 Wash. App. 661
  • 1971 Wash. App. LEXIS 1102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • unpublished Court of Appeals decisions complicate legal research, create unfair advantages for some lawyers, do not become a part of the common law and therefore will not be considered as authority
  • unpublished opinions of Washington Court of Appeals have no precedential value
  • \[U]npublished opinions... do not become a part of the common law of the state of Washington. If the trial courts were to consider them it ... would permit any group of lawyers to collect such opinions and create an unfair advantage by citing cases not available to their opponents.\
  • “[U]npublished opinions ... do not become a part of the common law of the state of Washington. If the trial courts were to consider them it. .. would permit any group of lawyers to collect such opinions and create an unfair advantage by citing cases not available to their opponents.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Petrie, Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.