Dept. of Legal Affairs v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an unwritten per curiam affirmance has no precedential value
• stating that per curiam decision should not be relied on for anything other than res judicata
• \... such a decision is not a precedent for a principle of law and should not be relied upon for anything other than res judicata.\
• “We reiterate that [a per curiam] decision is not a precedent for a principle of law and should not be relied upon for anything other than res judicata.”
• “We reiterate that [a per curiam] decision is not a precedent for a principle of law and should not be relied upon for anything other than res judicata.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).