State v. Fitzmaurice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We are not persuaded by [appellant’s] contention that the settlement amounted to an asset sale under [Mickey Thompson], because both parties to the settlement here released claims.”
• “We are not persuaded by [appellant’s] contention that the settlement amounted to an asset sale 14 under [Mickey Thompson], because both parties to the settlement here released claims.”
• “We are not persuaded by 13 [appellant’s] contention that the settlement amounted to an asset 14 sale under [Mickey Thompson], because both parties to the 15 settlement here released claims.” (citing In re Mickey Thompson 16 Entm’t Grp., Inc., 292 B.R. at 421)
• “We are not persuaded by 13 [appellant’s] contention that the settlement amounted to an asset 14 sale under [Mickey Thompson], because both parties to the 15 settlement here released claims.” (citing In re Mickey Thompson 16 Entm’t Grp., Inc., 292 B.R. at 421)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).