State v. Finister

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is axiomatic that the state must prove all elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt, if a criminal conviction is to stand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Birdwell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1972-01-03· cited 55×
• Washington Statewide Organization of Stepparents v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1975-06-19· cited 27×
• State v. Gillaspie
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-03-19· cited 25×
• State v. Bauer
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-05-24· cited 24×
• State v. Tikka
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-04-16· cited 20×
• Groves v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-11-04· cited 9×
• State v. Odom
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-01-02· cited 7×
• State v. Numrich
  Washington Supreme Court· 2021-02-04· cited 7×
• State v. Godines
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-06-04· cited 5×
• State v. Sizemore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-02-20· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Leary v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 1,672×
• Turner v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1970-01-26· cited 1,166×
• State v. Moore
  Washington Supreme Court· 1971-04-08· cited 86×
• State v. Ozanne
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-03-20· cited 14×
• State v. Chapman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1970-05-28· cited 4×

Other cases named State v. Finister

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• State v. Finister
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-01
• State v. Finister
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2015-05-22
• State v. Finister
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2015-08-27