State v. Fernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this Court could address as-applied constitutional challenge to statute even where trial court failed to make findings of fact because no such findings were necessary
• holding section 14- 415.1 constitutional as applied to the defendant
• “It is not unreasonable to prohibit a convicted felon who has subsequently violated the law on several occasions from possessing a firearm in order to preserve ‘public peace and safety.’ ”
• “It is not -5- STATE V. REECE Opinion of the Court unreasonable to prohibit a convicted felon who has subsequently violated the law on several occasions from possessing a firearm in order to preserve ‘public peace and safety.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Seam
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-12-18· cited 7×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-12-17
• State v. Guerrero
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-09-07
• State v. Hales
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-03-01
• State v. Nanes
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-02-19
• State v. Ducker
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-05-07
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-10-15

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• District of Columbia v. Heller
  Supreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 3,086×
• United States v. Marzzarella
  Third Circuit· 2010-07-29· cited 357×
• United States v. Chester
  Fourth Circuit· 2010-12-30· cited 287×
• United States v. Masciandaro
  Fourth Circuit· 2011-03-24· cited 178×
• James Hamilton v. William Pallozzi
  Fourth Circuit· 2017-02-17· cited 52×
• State v. Bonetsky
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-04-05· cited 4×