State v. Feldhacker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an older version of the Respondent’s notice was void because it contained statements of defendant’s rights that conflicted with the then existing implied consent statute, HRS § 286-253
• \the Administrative Revocation Program was designed to co-exist with criminal DUI prosecution.\
• “the Administrative Revocation Program was designed to co-exist with criminal DUI prosecution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wilson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1999-10-28· cited 79×
• Miller v. Tanaka
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1996-03-15· cited 18×
• Dunaway v. Administrative Director of the Courts
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2005-07-29· cited 7×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richardson v. City and County of Honolulu
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-02-18· cited 166×
• Methven-Abreu v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1992-07-27· cited 50×
• Kam v. Noh
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1989-03-09· cited 41×
• State v. Miyasaki
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1980-08-04· cited 37×
• Survivors of Wallace Medeiros v. Maui Land & Pineapple Co.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1983-03-09· cited 36×
• Hyatt Corp. v. Honolulu Liquor Commission
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1987-06-30· cited 21×
• Jacober v. Sunn
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1986-01-21· cited 14×