Hyatt Corp. v. Honolulu Liquor Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that an agency rule is void and cannot be enforced if its adoption was not authorized by statute
• commenting on Hawaii’s anti-discrimination laws and stating that “[t]he strength of this expressed public policy ... is beyond question”
• commenting on Hawai`i's anti-discrimination laws and stating that \[t]he strength of this expressed public policy ... is beyond question\
• “Because of the exceptionally broad authority granted to the Commission by statute (and] the substantial deference to which the Commission’s interpretation of the statute is entitled ..., we affirm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).