State v. Faulkner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that oral charge that the defendant “did attempt to commit theft” was fatally defective for failure to allege the essential element of intent
• stating that \[i]ntent is an essential element of the crime of criminal intent\ and \[n]o allegation of intent was made\
• stating that “[i]ntent is an essential element of the crime of criminal intent” and “[n]o allegation of intent was made”
• reversing conviction because charge could not be reasonably construed to state an offense
• accusation did not state an offense and was not sufficient to inform defendant of the nature of the accusation
• accusation did not state an offense and was not sufficient to inform defendant of the nature of the accusation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Holbron
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-10-20· cited 136×
• State v. Ganal
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-05-08· cited 124×
• State v. Sprattling
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-09-17· cited 73×
• State v. Elliott
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-11-07· cited 63×
• State v. Cummings
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2003-02-24· cited 58×
• State v. Nesmith
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-04-12· cited 57×
• State v. Halemanu
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1982-08-31· cited 38×
• State v. Robins
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1983-03-16· cited 36×
• State v. Tuua
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1982-08-30· cited 36×
• State v. Yonaha
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1986-08-07· cited 16×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-05· cited 15×
• State v. Kane
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1982-10-25· cited 13×
• State v. Adams
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-05-21· cited 7×
• State v. Kekuewa
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2007-07-31· cited 2×
• State v. Yamamoto.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-04-12