Skip to main content

State v. Farrow

Citations

  • 116 N.H. 731
  • 366 A.2d 1177
  • 1976 N.H. LEXIS 462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant’s right to confrontation required limited use of information protected by doctor/psychologist-patient privilege
  • criminal defendant may pierce therapist-patient privilege only as to materials found through in camera review “to be essential and reasonably necessary to permit counsel adequately to cross-examine for the purpose of showing unreliability or bias”
  • criminal defendant may pierce therapist-patient privilege only as to materials found through in camera review \to be essential and reasonably necessary to permit counsel adequately to cross-examine for the purpose of showing unreliability or bias\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.