Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 12/7/1976
State v. Farrow
Citations
- 116 N.H. 731
- 366 A.2d 1177
- 1976 N.H. LEXIS 462
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant’s right to confrontation required limited use of information protected by doctor/psychologist-patient privilege
- criminal defendant may pierce therapist-patient privilege only as to materials found through in camera review “to be essential and reasonably necessary to permit counsel adequately to cross-examine for the purpose of showing unreliability or bias”
- criminal defendant may pierce therapist-patient privilege only as to materials found through in camera review \to be essential and reasonably necessary to permit counsel adequately to cross-examine for the purpose of showing unreliability or bias\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. MinceyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-04-06· cited 518×
- Commonwealth v. KyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-20· cited 97×
- State v. GagneSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-08-14· cited 70×
- Omalza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-12-29· cited 67×
- State v. ThresherSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-02-12· cited 43×
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri· 1981-12-08· cited 42×
- Nelson v. LewisSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-11-09· cited 41×
- State v. GuaySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-09-20· cited 38×
- People v. PhippsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-07-17· cited 27×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-10-09· cited 24×
- State v. CookSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-06-25· cited 23×
- State v. KupchunSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-05-27· cited 19×
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-05-17· cited 14×
- In re Search Warrant for Medical Records of C.T.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-05-06· cited 12×
- In re Kathleen M.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-04-18· cited 10×
- Garrity v. ThomsonD. New Hampshire· 1979-02-08· cited 9×
- In Re CtSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-05-06· cited 3×
- United States Ex Rel. Patosky v. KozakiewiczW.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-03-24
- State of New Hampshire v. Stephen GirardSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2020-10-16
- State v. ZarellaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2025-05-01
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.