Skip to main content
· 2/12/1982

State v. Thresher

Citations

  • 122 N.H. 63
  • 442 A.2d 578
  • 1982 N.H. LEXIS 288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court properly refused to permit disclosure of privileged communications, in part, because “use of the privileged information was not essential to the defense”
  • stating that “the State need not prove . . . the medically precise cause of death because [it is not] an element of murder” (citations omitted)
  • amendment of indictment to change date of death of victim proper because amendment made prior to trial and defendant not prejudiced
  • decision to admit testimony within trial court’s discretion and jury can determine whether, and to what extent, to believe it
  • indictment alleging that defendant “in concert with and-aided by” another acted “knowingly” suffi ciently alleged accomplice or principal liability
  • a witness’ identification of boots as those worn by the defendant was a sufficient foundation for admission into evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batchelder, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.