State v. Farr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing appellate decisions from around the country on the issue of when separate convictions for possession are legally justified
• possessing pornography charge was a lesser included offense of delivering pornography charge because proof that defendant delivered video clip necessarily constituted proof that he possessed or controlled the clip
• noting that double jeopardy analysis does not conclude upon finding one charged offense is a lesser-included offense to another, because “it violates double jeopardy to punish a defendant for both a lesser included and greater offense only if both derive from the same criminal act”
• “[I]t violates double jeopardy to punish a defendant for both a lesser included and greater offense only if both derive from the same criminal act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kittrell v. Watson
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-02· cited 104×
• State v. Craig Michael Sanborn
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2015-12-18· cited 21×
• State of New Hampshire v. William Ramsey
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-01-28· cited 19×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-06-29· cited 18×
• State v. Gingras
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-11-02· cited 8×
• State v. Maxi
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2024-02-13· cited 3×
• State v. Stephens
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2016-03-18· cited 1×
• State v. Chalpin
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2024-07-12· cited 1×
• Wiglesworth v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2011-03-11
• Qualik Nashawn Davis v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2023-11-21
• State v. Heredia
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2024-06-13
• State of Maine v. Thomas G. Coffill III
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2026-02-26