Connecticut Appellate Court· 10/17/2006
State v. Farr
Citations
- 908 A.2d 556
- 98 Conn. App. 93
- 2006 Conn. App. LEXIS 440
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- identity may be proven by circumstantial evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop, Harper, McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SkiddConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-09-25· cited 28×
- State v. BlangoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-08-07· cited 21×
- State v. AyusoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-01-15· cited 13×
- State v. BarnwellConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-03· cited 11×
- State v. BardlivingConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-07-22· cited 9×
- State v. GILBERT I.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-04-08· cited 7×
- State v. BatistaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-06-05· cited 7×
- State v. DAVID O.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-12-11· cited 7×
- State v. DelvalleConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-07-15· cited 6×
- State v. MoralesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2016-03-29
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.