Skip to main content
· 12/11/2007

State v. DAVID O.

Citations

  • 937 A.2d 56
  • 104 Conn. App. 722
  • 2007 Conn. App. LEXIS 451
  • 2007 WL 4270556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant could not have been prejudiced by prosecutor’s remarks regarding crimes of which defendant was not con- victed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bishop, Harper, Dupont

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.