Supreme Court of Kansas· 2/1/2008

State v. Farmer

Citations

175 P.3d 221
285 Kan. 541
2008 Kan. LEXIS 19

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting multiplicity/double jeopardy claim when defendant was convicted of first-degree felony murder and criminal discharge of firearm at occupied vehicle resulting in great bodily harm based on shooting death of single victim
recognizing rule in context of criminal appeal
\There is no requirement that a criminal defendant challenge the sufficiency of the evidence before the trial court in order to preserve it for appeal.\
on factor of fairness of officers' interrogation, substantial competent evidence supported finding that officer was unaware of any religious beliefs defendant held, whether he attended church or regularly read the Bible
\The statute was designed to cover situations where there are difficulties in proving the shooter's intent.\
\There is no requirement that a criminal defendant challenge the sufficiency of the evidence before the trial court in order to preserve it for appeal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland, Beier, Davis, Greene, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.