Skip to main content

State v. Dickson

Citations

  • 69 P.3d 549
  • 275 Kan. 683
  • 2003 Kan. LEXIS 288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was no multiple acts error because State made the functional equivalent of an election when, in both opening statement and closing argument, the prosecutor informed the jury which single incident it was relying upon
  • holding that there was no multiple acts error because State made the functional equivalent of an election when, in both opening statement and closing argument, the prosecutor informed the jury which single incident it was relying upon
  • holding that there was no multiple acts error because State made the functional equivalent of an election when, in both opening statement and closing argument, the prosecutor informed the jury which single incident it was relying upon
  • holding that there was no multiple acts error because State made the functional equivalent of an election when, in both opening statement and closing argument, the prosecutor informed the jury which single incident it was relying upon
  • reversing conviction because State charged Dickson with causing a child to engage in sodomy with another person in violation of K.S.A. 21-3505[a][3], but the evidence at trial proved that Dickson himself engaged in sodomy with the child in violation of K.S.A. 21-3505[a][2]
  • conviction reversed without remand for new trial where evidence proved violation of subsection of statute different from one charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegrucci, Abbott, Gernon, Larson, Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.