Skip to main content

State v. Faria

Citations

  • 254 Conn. 613
  • 758 A.2d 348
  • 2000 Conn. LEXIS 293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no presumption of vindictiveness when second sentence imposed by a different judge
  • no presumption of vindictiveness when second sentence imposed by a different judge
  • \we recognize that the decisions of the federal circuit in which a state court is located are entitled to great weight in the interpretation of [the federal constitution]\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “there is no presumption of vindictiveness under Pearce simply because the underlying offense for which the second sentencing court enhanced the sentence pursuant to [General Statutes] § 53a-40 [¶] was different from the offense for which the original court enhanced the sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.