State v. Fanger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant expressly waived their right to a CrR 3.5 hearing by stipulating to admission of their statements
• defense counsel authorized to waive procedural matters such as a CrR 3.5 hearing on behalf ofthe client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Finch
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-05-06· cited 412×
• State v. Williams
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-04-22· cited 37×
• State v. Wolfer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-12-24· cited 23×
• State v. Alexander
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-08-03· cited 9×
• Fox v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-08-17· cited 9×
• State v. Varnell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-04-10· cited 8×
• State v. TIM S.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-06-18· cited 7×