Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/31/2001

State v. Espinosa

Citations

29 P.3d 278
200 Ariz. 503
353 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 9
2001 Ariz. App. LEXIS 112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver is required for “claims involving such constitutional rights as the right to counsel, the right to a jury trial, or the right to be tried by a twelve-person jury” (internal citations omitted)
“[P]reclusion does not apply to claims involving certain constitutional rights unless the record shows that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived the right.” (emphasis added)
had defendant timely challenged withdrawal of plea offer, either party could have sought special action relief from court's ruling
“[P]reclusion does not apply to claims involving cer- tain constitutional rights unless the record shows that the 8 Prior to 1992, Ariz. R. Crim. P. 32.2(a)(3
analyzing the rights allegedly violated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Druke, Espinosa, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.