District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/8/1981
State v. Escobedo
Citations
- 404 So. 2d 760
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Our forgery statute ... makes whoever `forges' documents of specified classes `with intent to injure or defraud any person' liable to a maximum of [five] years' imprisonment.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hubbart, C.J., and Baskin and Daniel S. Pearson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-01-12· cited 51×
- Rushing v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-13· cited 13×
- Billups v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-09· cited 2×
- Parker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-19· cited 2×
- Gadson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-14· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-01-15· cited 31×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-12-21· cited 20×
- Rapp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-03-08· cited 8×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1959-04-28· cited 7×
- Cush v. Bossier CityLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1963-01-02· cited 4×
- Folk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-11-22· cited 3×
- State v. RappSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-31· cited 3×
- Scarborough v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1921-10-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.