King v. State
Citations
- 43 Fla. 211
Syllabus
<p>Criminal law — Forgery—Indictment—Acting state attorney— Privately retained prosecutor may act — Capacity for harm of paper forged — Appellate practice — Excepting en masse to several charges.</p> <p>1. An allegation in an indictment for forgery to the effect that the defendant: '“did falsely make, forge and counterfeit a certain false, forged and counterfeit writing,” etc., should not, on a motion to quash, be construed to mean that the defend! ant falsely made and forged an already existent document that was itself a false and forged instrument, but it should receive the more liberal construction as meaning that the defendant did falsely make and forge the instrument as his own original creation, and that when so made by him it was a false, forged and counterfeit writing. The form of the allegation quoted is open to the criticism of being tautologus but does not for that reason vitiate the indictment.</p> <p>2. A mere brutum fulmén, on its face utterly valueless and of no binding force or efficacy for any purpose of harm, liability or injury to anyone, cannot be the subject of forgery. In order to be the subject of forgery the instrument forged must be upon its face, were it genuine, of some apparent legal efficacy for injury to another, or, as Mr. Wharton expresses it: “Should be one which would expose another to legal process.”</p> <p>3. Though the instrument forged purports upon its face to grant an estate in land for a term of more than two years, but is invalid and ineffectual as a lease for such term because it is witnessed by only one witness when the statute requires two to give it effectiveness as such, yet if the instrument, were it genuine, could be specifically enforced in equity as a contract for a lease, or if it was effective as a license to make entry upon the land described therein, so as to shield parties entering under it from the charge of trespass, it'is not an absolute nullity, but is effective for injury to. another, and is, therefore, th
Judges: Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Akin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-12-20· cited 63×
- Richbourg v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 35×
- Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-03-04· cited 29×
- State v. FravinSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1915-06-19· cited 20×
- Kirk v. BakerSupreme Court of Florida· 1969-04-15· cited 15×
- Hobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-04-05· cited 14×
- State v. Ensor and ComptonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-05-05· cited 12×
- Norwood v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-07-23· cited 10×
- Robertson v. United States ex rel. WatsonSupreme Court· 2010-05-24· cited 10×
- Ruge v. Webb Press Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1916-04-18· cited 7×
- State v. EscobedoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-09-08· cited 5×
- Revels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1911-06-15· cited 5×
- West v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 4×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 2×
- Thornton v. CulverSupreme Court of Florida· 1958-10-01· cited 1×
- Whitfield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-01-26· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dukes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1859-03-14· cited 75×
- State v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court· 1854-07-01· cited 71×
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1896-07-08· cited 43×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-01-15· cited 34×
- Jenkins v. LykesSupreme Court of Florida· 1882-06-15· cited 23×
- McCoggle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 20×
- People v. GallowayNew York Supreme Court· 1837-10-15· cited 20×
- State v. GonzalesTexas Supreme Court· 1862-07-01· cited 17×
- Roode v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1876-07-15· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. DallingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1875-09-01· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.