State v. Erickson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “After a bill of particulars is ordered furnished and is filed by the State and until it is properly amended, the State is limited to proving the particulars specified in the bill.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Balanza
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2000-06-02· cited 78×
• State v. Reed
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 54×
• State v. Davalos
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2007-02-28· cited 8×
• State v. Rullman
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1995-05-25· cited 7×
• State v. Valenzona
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1999-12-17· cited 6×
• State v. Kim
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1990-01-22· cited 5×
• State v. Bright.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2020-06-03
• State v. Masuda-Mercado. ICA s.d.o., filed 09/10/2024 [ada], 154 Haw. 508. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 12/08/2024. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 01/21/2025 [ada].
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2025-09-17