State v. Eisenhour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the “numerical value” of a positive preliminary breath test is inadmissible as exculpatory evidence because section 577.021.3 provides the test “shall not be admissible as evidence of blood alcohol content”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Roux
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-09-12· cited 5×
• STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. LONNIE EUGENE HOGSETT
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-09-25· cited 1×
• David Prior Wilmoth v. Director of Revenue
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2023-06-13

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Tisius
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2002-12-10· cited 165×
• State v. Pike
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2005-04-26· cited 104×
• Elery v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 92×
• State v. McFadden
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2013-01-29· cited 55×
• State v. Walkup
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2007-05-01· cited 43×
• State v. Cella
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2000-11-14· cited 42×
• State v. Stottlemyre
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-01-23· cited 21×
• State v. Mort
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-09-09· cited 21×
• Eagan v. Duello
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-08-30· cited 14×
• Pattie v. French Quarter Resorts
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-02-13· cited 14×
• State v. Duncan
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-09-19· cited 13×
• State v. Morgenroth
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-06-20· cited 12×
• State v. Hardin
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-06-05· cited 9×
• State v. Robertson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-12-14· cited 8×